Call us for free on 0800 1777 522
Info Articles

NA Legal

Solicitors for small & medium business.

Public Inquiries in Leeds

The office of the Traffic Commissioner for the North East of England is located at Hillcrest House in the Harehills Area of Leeds. The address at Harehills House will be familiar with operators all over the country because this is also the location of the Central Licensing office which deals with operator licence applications throughout the whole of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

The current Traffic Commissioner for the North East of England is Kevin Rooney who has been in position since 2012. Mr Rooney is, as of the 1st November 2016 to take over as the Traffic Commissioner for the Western Traffic Area in Bristol. Until a replacement Commissioner is appointed Mr Rooney will administer both traffic areas.

All operators called to a goods vehicle public inquiry or a passenger vehicle public inquiry whose operating centres are within the North East Traffic Area are dealt with from Leeds. Most of the hearings take place in Leeds though sometimes the public inquiry hearing itself may take place at venues in other places. This is usually where there is particular local interest such as where members of the public have raised objections to an operators licence.

What's covered by the North East Traffic Area ?

The North East Traffic area covers a large part of the country. It covers ground from the East Midlands up to the Scottish borders and large swathes of the East coast. The following counties all come under the North East Traffic Area :

Northumberland; Durham; Tyneside and Wearside; Teeside; West Yorkshire; East Yorkshire; South Yorkshire; North Lincolnshire; North East Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire.

This area covers many of the great towns and cities of the North of England including Newcastle, Middlesborough, Sunderland, Leeds, Bradford, Sheffield, Doncaster, Rotherham, Barnsley, Wakefield, Scunthorpe, Grimsby, Nottingham and Hull.

There are about 11,600 goods vehicle operator licences and 1,560 passenger vehicle (PSV) operator licences issued within the North East Traffic Area.

Public Inquiries in Leeds

Public Inquiries are held in Leeds in one of two court rooms which are located on the second floor at Hillcrest House.

Public Inquiry hearings will be heard by the Traffic Commissioner himself or a deputy Traffic Commissioner. You can read more about the public inquiry process on our page called About Public Inquiries.

According to the latest annual figures, there were at total of 75 passenger vehicle public inquiries and 150 goods vehicle public inquiries during 2014 / 2015. Of the passenger vehicle public inquires, 50 were for disciplinary action against the operators licence and 26 for new applications. 93 of the goods vehicle public inquiries were for disciplinary action and 63 for new applications.


Outcomes of Passenger Vehicle (PSV) Public Inquires in Leeds

Result of disciplinary public inquiries :

Out of 50 public inquiries for disciplinary action, 25 (50%) had their operators licence revoked. A further 3 (6%) had their licence suspended and 2 had their vehicle fleets reduced. 12 got away with only a written warning and only 6 (12%) resulted in no action being taken at all.

Result of applications heard at public inquiry :

There were 26 public inquiries dealing with new applications. Of these 7 (22%) were refused outright, 3 were partially granted and 16 were granted in full.

Outcomes of Goods Vehicle (HGV) Public Inquiries in Leeds

Result of disciplinary public inquiries :

Out of 93 public inquiries considering disciplinary action for compliance issues, 30 (almost a third) resulted in the operators licence being revoked / terminated. A further 11 resulted in suspension and 21 in a reduction of the number of vehicles authorised. This means that in two thirds of goods vehicle public inquiries dealt with at Leeds for non-compliance, resulted in the licence being terminated, suspended or cut back in size. Of the remaining third, nearly all had a formal warning. On 4 got through with no action being taken at all.


Result of applications heard at public inquiry :

63 applications were dealt with at public inquiries in Leeds for the year. 52 of these were granted. 5 were refused and 4 were partially granted.

What to do if you've been called to a public inquiry in Leeds

First of all, recognise that any public inquiry called for any reason is a very serious thing. Secondly recognise that getting legal advice and having an experienced transport law solicitor on your side is half the problem sorted. A good transport law specialist will be able to get stuck into your case and do all sorts of things to get you ready to face the Traffic Commissioner.

We strongly recommend that you speak to us urgently if you've had a call to public inquiry. Nearly all of our clients (well over 90%) have a successful outcome at their public inquiries.

We regularly handle public inquiries at Leeds and know exactly how to prepare a successful and present a successful case. We've been doing it for years and have helped hundreds of operators through this difficult time.

Call Simon Newman on 01302 775522. I will be glad to talk through your situation and review your papers free of charge to enable you to make an informed decision about whether to get us on board.

Public Inquiries in Birmingham
Public Inquiries in Cardiff and Wales

Call us for free on 0800 1777 522


Get In Touch Call or fill out the form below

Please let us know your name.
Please let us know your email address.
Please write a subject for your message.
Please let us know your message.
Invalid Input

 


We advise and represent transport businesses throughout the whole of the UK in all parts of England, Scotland, Wales and N.Ireland

Uk





Latest Blogs

We were approached by an operator who had received public inquiry paper several weeks earlier. The Operator instructed us to represent him at his inquiry listed for a hearing before the Traffic Commis...
We recently represented two companies who were both called to the same public inquiry. Although separate entities, the companies were closely connected because of having the same set of directors. One...
We were approached by a small business owner to represent them at the a public inquiry which had been called to consider their application for a new passenger vehicle operator’s licence.The person app...

IF YOU NEED HELP OR ADVICE WITH A TRANSPORT LAW ISSUE

Call us today for free on 0800 1777 522
Send us an enquiry online via our contact form HERE
Email us on contact@nalegal.co.uk

Latest Transport Law

Transport Law
We were approached by an operator who had received public inquiry paper several weeks earlier. The Operator instructed us to represent him at his inquiry listed for a hearing before the Traffic Commissioner’s (TC) only two weeks in advance.

There were several serious issues that the TC indicated he wanted to examine at the hearing and was threatening regulatory action against the Operator Company. The Operator had approached another firm of solicitors, who informed him that the likely outcome of the hearing would be loss of repute and licence revocation.

We provided the Operator with advice about immediate steps to be taken in preparation for the hearing. We requested the operator send us a number of documents critical to the success of his inquiry. A consideration of those document showed significant—but not insurmountable—shortfalls in maintenance standards and legal requirements.

The operator had recently appointed a new Transport Manager (TM) with an excellent reputation in his field. The TM worked along with us in analysing the Company’s compliance systems to create better compliance systems and improve the of the Company’s mindset about such.

We prepared extensive written representations and sent these to the TC in advance of the hearing along with supporting documentation.

We recommended that both the Operator (Director) and his Transport Manager attend the hearing. As expected the TC questioned the Operator and TM extensively about the various issued raised. We guided and advised the Operator and TM throughout the hearing. Following our final submissions, the TC decided not to revoke the licence or disqualify the Operator Company. The Operator was issued with a warning and a very short suspension of one vehicle until it had a further maintenance inspection and remedial work done. The Operator was allowed to keep the rest of his fleet working with minimal disruption to the business. The Operator was thrilled with our services and has since instructed us at least one other transport matter.
Transport Law
We recently represented two companies who were both called to the same public inquiry. Although separate entities, the companies were closely connected because of having the same set of directors. One of the companies (the Operator) had years previously been issued with a restricted goods vehicle operator’s licence. The other company had recently applied for the same kind of licence (the Applicant).

Over the previous year, the directors had decided to progressively move most of the Operator’s business interests to its sister company the Applicant. Without understanding the potential consequences, and before being granted its operator’s licence, the Applicant began using the Operator’s heavy goods vehicle. The Operator company had not informed the Traffic Commissioner (TC) of its change in business arrangements and of the apparent change of entity (though the companies were actually wholly owned subsidiaries of another company – see below).

The Public Inquiry was convened because of changes at this business group and a fundamental misunderstanding of the operator’s licence regime, and that there had been what appeared to be a change of entity involving the companies.

The TC needed to be satisfied as to whether the companies were not unfit to hold an operator’s licence due to relevant activities and convictions, and about the events relating to a change in the circumstances of the licence holder. The Operator risked revocation of its licence. The Applicant was at risk of not having its licence granted.

In advance of the inquiry, and to start building their case, we obtained as much information as we could about the businesses and provided each company comprehensive legal advice. We examined the companies’ compliance systems and made recommendations about immediate and longer-term changes that needed to be implemented. On our recommendations, the companies invested time and resources into their maintenance and other systems

As a result of our preliminary work and advice, the companies were fully prepared for the public inquiry hearing. In particular, to answer questions and provide evidence about the apparent change of entity.

At the hearing we demonstrated that the companies were running professional and competent businesses. With specific reference to the issue of the apparent change of entity, the TC accepted that Section 3(4) of the Goods vehicle (licencing of operators) Act 1995 was relevant and that this was not a typical “change of entity” case – because of the companies being subsidiaries. We were able to persuade the TC that the issues that lead to the inquiry arose out of ignorance rather than an attempt to mislead or gain financial advantage

The TC granted the new licence to the Applicant with the Operator company voluntarily surrendering its licence. The directors were delighted with the outcome of the public inquiry hearing and that they managed to avoid the damaging consequences they feared.
Transport Law

We were approached by a small business owner to represent them at the a public inquiry which had been called to consider their application for a new passenger vehicle operator’s licence.

The person applying for the licence had a long background of work in the transport industry as a driver but had never before operated his own transport business. One of the key issues was that the nominated transport manager was also nominated some other licences and the Traffic Commissioner was concerned whether this meant that the transport manager would be able to properly carry out their duties on so many licences at once.