Call us for free on 0800 1777 522
Info Articles

NA Legal

Solicitors for small & medium business.

A Bit About Searches & Surveys

When dealing with commercial properties it is advisable to carry out property searches and surveys along similar lines to when you buy a new house.  Here we outline the main types and why they are important.  

There might be occasions when it isn’t necessary to carry out searches at all, other occasions when rudimentary searches are appropriate and other cases where it would be advisable for you to carry out a full and detailed set of searches.

Similarly, there are occasions when it is highly advisable to have a surveyor do a survey of premises you are looking at buying or leasing.

This guide sets out the main types of searches and surveys to enable you to understand what these are and make an informed decision on whether you require them.

Part One : Main Types of Searches

Local Authority Searches

This is a report by the Local Authority dealing with a whole mass of information relating to matters affecting the property and the surrounding area.

Among other things, the Local Authority search covers the following:

• Planning control history

• Building control history

• Nearby road schemes and motorways

• Contaminated land

• Whether the area is affected by radon gas

• Listed building status

• Conservation areas

• Tree protection orders

• Improvement or renovation grants

• Smoke control zones

• Future developments

There are a number of optional extras that can be added to the standard Local Authority search (this is called Con29(O)) and this covers the following matters:

• Road proposals by private bodies

• Public paths or byways

• Advertisements

• Completion notices

• Parks and countryside

• Pipelines

• Houses in multiple occupation

• Noise abatement orders

• Urban development areas

• Enterprise zones

• Inner urban improvement areas

• Simplified planning zones

• Land maintenance notices

• Mineral consultation areas

• Hazardous substance consents

• Environmental and pollution notices

• Food safety notices

• Hedgerow notices

• Common land, town and village greens

Local Authority searches generally take a week or two to arrive after they have been ordered. Each Local Authority charges their own fee and these vary quite considerably from council to council. Typically, Local Authority Searches can cost anything from less than £100 to about £250 or more.

Land Registry Searches

This amounts to obtaining a copy of the entry on the national land register of a particular property.

The Land Registry entry should be carefully examined in every single property transaction (whether leasehold or freehold). The entries for a particular property will include a plan and description of the property along with details of the registered title to the property. This will include the following matters:

• The registered owner of the property and details of when it last changed hands

• Details of restrictions on rights to deal with the property

• Any restrictive covenants

• Whether there is a mortgage registered on the property and/or other types of registered security

• Things such as rights of way and other rights and restrictions that could affect the property

Land Registry searches are quick and easy to obtain and normally cost about £10 or so.

Water and Drainage Search

This is a report made by the local water company. The search provides information regarding water and sewerage services for a particular property and details of whether there is drainage for surface water (surface water is effectively rain). There is also information on whether the condition of the public sewers servicing the property present a risk of flooding. There is also information about whether the water to the property is metered and whether there is any issue with water pressure and various other matters that could be relevant to a business that is dependent on uninterrupted water supply.

Mining Searches

The most common types of mining searches are coal and brine and tin in Cornwall. These searches show whether there have been mining activities in the vicinity of a property. The search reports give details of the likelihood of ground disturbances and subsidence as a result of past or current mining activity.

Utility Searches

Utility Searches Provide Information Relevant to the Property relating to the supply of gas, electricity and telecommunication services. These reports tell you whether the property is connected to a mains supply and about pipes and cables etc.

The price of these searches varies.

Environmental Searches

This search reports on whether past use of a property or land nearby could have led to land contamination. An example might be where there has been some kind of past industrial use of a property where the land could potentially be contaminated with dangerous chemicals.

These searches are quite quick to obtain, they normally come back within about two days of them being ordered. Prices do vary but are roughly in the £35-£50 band.

You should note that the environmental search report does not actually say whether the property is or is not contaminated. It reports on risk and an inspection in person by an environmental surveyor would be required to confirm for certain.

Chancel Repair Search

Chancel Repair Liability is an anachronistic right whereby some Parish Churches are able, for historical reasons, to charge local occupiers for repairs to the Parish Church. This is a very controversial right and has been the subject in recent years of several high profile court cases. It all comes from where, in the dim and distant past, land that had previously belonged to the Parish Church was sold off and the obligation to pay for repairs to the Parish Church was inherited by the new owners.

A Chancel Repair Search tells you whether a property is in an area which could give right to a Chancel Repair Liability. Where there is a potential liability, this can easily be militated by taking out an insurance policy.

Both the Chancel Repair Search and any insurance policy are relatively low cost. The search should be considered for any property buyer that is relatively close to any Parish Church.

Part Two : Surveys

Building Condition Survey

This should always be considered when taking on new premises whether you are taking the freehold or leasehold. In both cases, to some extent you will be liable for the cost of repairs to the building or at least a part of the building. The current condition of the property is therefore very relevant.

A Building Condition Survey would be where a Chartered Surveyor inspects the property and reports to you on its condition and any particular concerns and the need for future repairs.

In some cases it might be appropriate for your surveyor to produce what is called a “Schedule of Condition”. A Schedule of Condition is a fully itemised schedule of the condition of each part of the building or property and would highlight all items of disrepair or whether future repairs might be necessary.

Valuation Survey

This is where your surveyor assess the value of a property. It could either be the price of the freehold or the rental value. You should consider having this done if you have doubts about whether you are paying a market rate.

Electrical, Heating and Gas Surveys

These are reports on the condition of the electrical, heating or gas systems within the property. As a bare minimum you should obtain a Gas Safety Certificate where there is a gas supply to any property. You should also consider whether you require an Electrical Safety Certificate prior to taking on any new premises. There are also surveys you can have done to report on the heating system and whether it is fit for its purpose.

Drainage Inspection

This is where you have a full inspection of the drainage system to make sure that it’s fit for purpose and to ensure that it is in a proper state or repair and is not likely to need expensive repairs in the near future.

Simon Newman - January 2017

For more information about this article or anything else you would like advice on please contact us free on 0800 1777 522.

Case Study : Bus company on Fourth Public Inquiry
Public Inquiries in Northern Ireland

Call us for free on 0800 1777 522

Get In Touch Call or fill out the form below

Please let us know your name.
Please let us know your email address.
Please write a subject for your message.
Please let us know your message.
Invalid Input


We advise and represent transport businesses throughout the whole of the UK in all parts of England, Scotland, Wales and N.Ireland


Latest Blogs

We were approached by an operator who had received public inquiry paper several weeks earlier. The Operator instructed us to represent him at his inquiry listed for a hearing before the Traffic Commis...
We recently represented two companies who were both called to the same public inquiry. Although separate entities, the companies were closely connected because of having the same set of directors. One...
We were approached by a small business owner to represent them at the a public inquiry which had been called to consider their application for a new passenger vehicle operator’s licence.The person app...


Call us today for free on 0800 1777 522
Send us an enquiry online via our contact form HERE
Email us on

Latest Transport Law

Transport Law
We were approached by an operator who had received public inquiry paper several weeks earlier. The Operator instructed us to represent him at his inquiry listed for a hearing before the Traffic Commissioner’s (TC) only two weeks in advance.

There were several serious issues that the TC indicated he wanted to examine at the hearing and was threatening regulatory action against the Operator Company. The Operator had approached another firm of solicitors, who informed him that the likely outcome of the hearing would be loss of repute and licence revocation.

We provided the Operator with advice about immediate steps to be taken in preparation for the hearing. We requested the operator send us a number of documents critical to the success of his inquiry. A consideration of those document showed significant—but not insurmountable—shortfalls in maintenance standards and legal requirements.

The operator had recently appointed a new Transport Manager (TM) with an excellent reputation in his field. The TM worked along with us in analysing the Company’s compliance systems to create better compliance systems and improve the of the Company’s mindset about such.

We prepared extensive written representations and sent these to the TC in advance of the hearing along with supporting documentation.

We recommended that both the Operator (Director) and his Transport Manager attend the hearing. As expected the TC questioned the Operator and TM extensively about the various issued raised. We guided and advised the Operator and TM throughout the hearing. Following our final submissions, the TC decided not to revoke the licence or disqualify the Operator Company. The Operator was issued with a warning and a very short suspension of one vehicle until it had a further maintenance inspection and remedial work done. The Operator was allowed to keep the rest of his fleet working with minimal disruption to the business. The Operator was thrilled with our services and has since instructed us at least one other transport matter.
Transport Law
We recently represented two companies who were both called to the same public inquiry. Although separate entities, the companies were closely connected because of having the same set of directors. One of the companies (the Operator) had years previously been issued with a restricted goods vehicle operator’s licence. The other company had recently applied for the same kind of licence (the Applicant).

Over the previous year, the directors had decided to progressively move most of the Operator’s business interests to its sister company the Applicant. Without understanding the potential consequences, and before being granted its operator’s licence, the Applicant began using the Operator’s heavy goods vehicle. The Operator company had not informed the Traffic Commissioner (TC) of its change in business arrangements and of the apparent change of entity (though the companies were actually wholly owned subsidiaries of another company – see below).

The Public Inquiry was convened because of changes at this business group and a fundamental misunderstanding of the operator’s licence regime, and that there had been what appeared to be a change of entity involving the companies.

The TC needed to be satisfied as to whether the companies were not unfit to hold an operator’s licence due to relevant activities and convictions, and about the events relating to a change in the circumstances of the licence holder. The Operator risked revocation of its licence. The Applicant was at risk of not having its licence granted.

In advance of the inquiry, and to start building their case, we obtained as much information as we could about the businesses and provided each company comprehensive legal advice. We examined the companies’ compliance systems and made recommendations about immediate and longer-term changes that needed to be implemented. On our recommendations, the companies invested time and resources into their maintenance and other systems

As a result of our preliminary work and advice, the companies were fully prepared for the public inquiry hearing. In particular, to answer questions and provide evidence about the apparent change of entity.

At the hearing we demonstrated that the companies were running professional and competent businesses. With specific reference to the issue of the apparent change of entity, the TC accepted that Section 3(4) of the Goods vehicle (licencing of operators) Act 1995 was relevant and that this was not a typical “change of entity” case – because of the companies being subsidiaries. We were able to persuade the TC that the issues that lead to the inquiry arose out of ignorance rather than an attempt to mislead or gain financial advantage

The TC granted the new licence to the Applicant with the Operator company voluntarily surrendering its licence. The directors were delighted with the outcome of the public inquiry hearing and that they managed to avoid the damaging consequences they feared.
Transport Law

We were approached by a small business owner to represent them at the a public inquiry which had been called to consider their application for a new passenger vehicle operator’s licence.

The person applying for the licence had a long background of work in the transport industry as a driver but had never before operated his own transport business. One of the key issues was that the nominated transport manager was also nominated some other licences and the Traffic Commissioner was concerned whether this meant that the transport manager would be able to properly carry out their duties on so many licences at once.